The Story of Literature EP2 | Echoes of Olympus: The Greek and Roman Foundations 

by | Oct 1, 2025 | Literature And Us, The Story of Literature

Episode 02_Echoes of Olympus

Last time, we sat in the firelight of a long-dead civilization and heard the story of Gilgamesh, a king who journeyed to the end of the world only to learn that mortality was his inescapable fate. His vision of the afterlife was terrifying: a cold, dark house of dust where the dead ate clay. It’s a grim picture, one that leaves you with a profound sense of human fragility in the face of capricious gods.But what if the gods weren’t just distant, terrifying forces? What if they were a dysfunctional family of super-powered beings, constantly squabbling, having affairs, and meddling in human lives like cosmic reality TV stars? What if a hero wasn’t defined by a quest for immortality, but by his earth-shattering rage, or by his cleverness and desperate desire to get home? And what if you could put all of that human messiness—the pride, the love, the jealousy, the grief—onto a stage for the entire city to watch and learn from?

To find these stories, we must leave the sun-baked plains of Mesopotamia and set our sails for the Aegean Sea, a world of rocky islands, ancient olive groves, and a sky so blue it hurts to look at. We’re journeying to ancient Greece and Rome, civilizations that took the seeds of storytelling and nurtured them into an incredible forest of poetry, drama, and philosophy. These are the stories that became the bedrock of Western literature, the tales whose echoes still bounce around in our lecture halls, our theaters, and our political debates today. Prepare to meet the heroes, monsters, and thinkers of Olympus.

A Storyteller in the Dark?

Our journey begins with a mystery, a shadow. His name is Homer, and he is, without a doubt, the most famous and influential poet you know almost nothing about. The ancient Greeks believed he was a single, blind poet, an aoidos or “singer of tales,” who wandered from court to court, composing and performing epic poems to the accompaniment of a lyre. Modern scholars, however, love to argue. Was Homer one person? A committee? Was he even a he? Was he just a name attached to a long and evolving tradition of oral storytelling?

The truth is, we’ll probably never know. But in a way, it doesn’t matter. What matters are the stories credited to his name, two towering pillars of literature: The Iliad and The Odyssey. These poems weren’t just entertainment for the ancient Greeks. They were their history, their scripture, and their moral compass all rolled into one. Composed sometime around the 8th century BCE, they looked back to a supposed “Age of Heroes,” the time of the great Mycenaean kings and the legendary Trojan War. For a Greek world just emerging from its own “Dark Age,” these stories were a vital link to a glorious, half-forgotten past. And they begin not with a battle, but with a temper tantrum.

The Rage of Achilles: The Iliad

If you think The Iliad is the story of the Trojan War, you’re not wrong, but you’re missing the point. Homer tells you his theme in the very first word of the poem: Mēnin. Rage. “Sing, Goddess,” the poem begins, “of the rage of Achilles, son of Peleus.”This isn’t a sprawling history of a ten-year war. It’s an intense, psychological close-up on a few weeks in the final year of that war, and it all revolves around the colossal, terrifying, and deeply human anger of its greatest warrior.

Here’s the setup: The Achaeans (the Greeks) have been besieging the city of Troy for nearly ten years. Their best fighter is Achilles, a man who is practically invincible in battle but is also proud, stubborn, and emotionally volatile. The leader of the army is Agamemnon, a king who is powerful but insecure. The trouble starts when Agamemnon, forced to give up his own war-prize, a captured woman named Chryseis, decides to compensate himself by taking Achilles’ war-prize, a woman named Briseis.For a modern reader, this can seem like a squabble over property. But in the heroic world, this is everything. Briseis is a symbol of Achilles’ timê—his honor, his value, his public reputation. By taking her, Agamemnon is publicly humiliating him, telling him he’s not valued. Achilles, predictably, explodes. He nearly draws his sword to kill Agamemnon on the spot but is restrained by the goddess Athena. Instead, he uses words. He unleashes a torrent of abuse on Agamemnon and then makes a fateful decision: he withdraws from the war. He and his men will sit by their ships and refuse to fight until his honor is restored.

And with Achilles out of the picture, the Greeks start to get annihilated. This is the consequence of his rage. Homer gives us a panoramic view of the battlefield, a brutal and bloody place. It’s not a sanitized, Hollywood version of war. We learn the names of men just as they are speared through the throat. We see friends dying for friends. It’s visceral and heartbreaking.

All the while, the gods are watching from Mount Olympus, and they are anything but impartial observers. They have their favorites. Hera and Athena hate the Trojans, while Apollo and Aphrodite support them. Zeus, the king of the gods, tries to remain neutral but is constantly being manipulated by his wife, Hera. These gods are not models of divine wisdom. They bicker, they deceive each other, they get wounded in battle and go crying to Zeus. They are a reflection of human passions, writ large across the heavens.The Greeks get pushed back to their ships. Agamemnon panics and sends an embassy to Achilles, offering him a mountain of treasure and the return of Briseis if he’ll only come back and fight. Achilles’ response is shocking. He refuses. He gives a powerful, bitter speech, questioning the entire heroic code. “I see now that the brave man and the coward are held in the same honor,” he says. Why should he risk his life for a man like Agamemnon? He knows he has a choice of two fates: he can either stay and fight at Troy, winning eternal glory but dying young, or he can go home and live a long, anonymous life. For the first time, he considers choosing life over glory.

What finally brings him back to the war is not honor, but love. His dearest friend, Patroclus, seeing the slaughter of his comrades, begs Achilles to let him wear his armor and lead their men into battle to push the Trojans back. Achilles reluctantly agrees, but warns him: drive the Trojans from the ships, but do not pursue them to the city walls. Patroclus, caught up in the glory of battle, forgets the warning. He charges too far, and is killed by the great Trojan prince, Hector.

The news of Patroclus’s death shatters Achilles. His grief is as monumental as his rage. He pours dirt and ash over his head, he lies in the dust, he refuses to eat. And then, his grief curdles and hardens back into rage, but this time it’s a different kind. It’s a cold, nihilistic fury directed at one man: Hector. He gets a new suit of armor forged by the god Hephaestus himself and returns to the battlefield, no longer a sulking soldier, but a force of nature, a veritable death machine.

The climax of the poem is the duel between Achilles and Hector. It is a terrifying and tragic confrontation. Hector, knowing he is doomed, stands his ground to defend his city. The fight is swift and brutal. Achilles, possessed by his fury, drives his spear through Hector’s throat. But he doesn’t stop there. In a shocking act of desecration, he ties Hector’s body to the back of his chariot and drags it in the dust around the walls of Troy, in full view of Hector’s weeping family.It’s a horrifying moment. The hero has become a monster. And this is where The Iliad reveals its true genius. The story doesn’t end with the victory. It ends with a quiet, profound act of humanity. One night, Priam, the elderly king of Troy and Hector’s father, guided by the god Hermes, risks everything to sneak into the Greek camp and enter Achilles’ tent. He kneels and kisses the hands of the man who killed his son. “Think of your own father,” he begs, “and take pity on me.”

And in that moment, something in Achilles breaks. He looks at this grieving old man and sees the image of his own father, who will soon lose his son. He sees their shared humanity, their shared sorrow. He weeps with Priam. The rage is finally gone, washed away by a flood of empathy. He returns Hector’s body for a proper burial. The poem ends not with the fall of Troy, but with the funeral of a Trojan hero. It’s a story that tells us that our shared grief is more powerful than our rage, and that the only true victory is the recovery of our own humanity.

The Cunning Man’s Long Way Home: The Odyssey

If The Iliad is about a hero of biê, or brute force, defined by his rage, The Odyssey is about a hero of mêtis, or cunning intelligence, defined by his resilience. Its hero is Odysseus, one of the Greek leaders from the Trojan War, who is now just trying to get home to his island kingdom of Ithaca. It should be a simple sea voyage. It takes him ten years.

The Odyssey is one of the most foundational adventure stories ever told, a template for nearly every quest narrative that has followed. It’s a rambling, episodic tale of monsters, witches, and angry gods. But underneath the adventure, it’s a story about identity and perseverance. It asks: Who are you when you’ve been stripped of your home, your name, your crew, and your status? What does it take not just to survive, but to come home?

Odysseus is a new kind of hero. He’s still a great warrior, but his primary weapon is his mind. He’s a brilliant strategist, a master of disguise, and a pathological liar. And he needs every ounce of that cleverness to survive. He blinds the Cyclops Polyphemus not by overpowering him, but by getting him drunk and telling him his name is “Noman,” so that when the Cyclops bellows for help, he screams “Noman is killing me!” He navigates between the six-headed monster Scylla and the whirlpool Charybdis. He resists the song of the Sirens by having his men tie him to the mast, so he can hear their enchanting song without crashing his ship on the rocks.

His journey is also a psychological one. He spends a year under the spell of the sorceress Circe, who turns his men into pigs. He spends seven years as a virtual captive of the beautiful nymph Calypso, who offers him immortality if he will stay and be her husband. It’s a tempting offer. He could have a life of endless pleasure with a goddess. But Odysseus refuses. He chooses his mortal life, his aging wife Penelope, and his home. He chooses humanity over divinity.

One of the most powerful moments is his journey to the underworld. Unlike Enkidu’s bleak vision of a house of dust, Odysseus can actually speak to the dead. He meets his own mother, he meets fallen comrades from Troy, and he meets the ghost of Achilles. Odysseus praises him, saying he must be a great king even among the dead. Achilles’ reply is a stunning rejection of his entire life’s code of honor: “Don’t you try to console me for death, glorious Odysseus. I would rather be a slave on earth for another man… than be king over all the exhausted dead.” The great hero who chose a short, glorious life over a long one now sees the value of life itself, no matter how humble.

Meanwhile, back in Ithaca, his wife Penelope is holding the kingdom together. She is just as clever and resilient as her husband, fending off a hundred arrogant suitors who have overrun her palace, eating her food and demanding she choose one of them to marry. For years, she holds them off by promising to choose a husband once she finishes weaving a burial shroud for Odysseus’s father, but every night, she secretly unravels the work she did that day.When Odysseus finally returns, he can’t just walk in and reclaim his throne. He’s a ragged, unrecognizable beggar. He has to use his wits to scout the situation, to test the loyalty of his servants, and to devise a plan. The climax is not just a battle, but a test. Penelope, ever cautious, announces she will marry the man who can string Odysseus’s great bow and shoot an arrow through twelve axe heads. All the suitors try and fail. Then the beggar asks for a turn. He strings the bow with ease, makes the impossible shot, and then, with his son Telemachus by his side, he slaughters every last one of the suitors in a frenzy of brutal, long-awaited vengeance. Even then, Penelope tests him one last time, with a secret about their marriage bed, before she finally accepts that her husband has come home. It’s a story that tells us that home isn’t just a place you go back to; it’s something you have to fight for, reclaim, and rebuild.

From Revelry to Tragedy

While Homer’s epics were sung in the halls of aristocrats, the city of Athens in the 5th century BCE was developing a new, radical form of storytelling: theater. And like so many good things in ancient Greece, it started with a party.

Athenian drama grew out of the wild, drunken festivals celebrating Dionysus, the god of wine, fertility, theater, and ecstatic frenzy. Originally, these festivals involved a chorus of men who would sing and dance hymns called dithyrambs in praise of the god. The big innovation, supposedly by a man named Thespis, was to have one member of the chorus step out and begin speaking as a character, engaging in a dialogue with the rest. Suddenly, you didn’t just have narration; you had impersonation. You had an actor. And from that simple step, drama was born.

For the Athenians, theater wasn’t just a night out. It was a massive civic event, a religious ritual, and a democratic forum all at once. For three days, the entire city—citizens, slaves, men, women—would gather in a huge open-air amphitheater. They watched a series of plays, funded by wealthy citizens as part of their civic duty. The actors were all men, wearing larger-than-life masks that conveyed character and emotion to the thousands of people in the cheap seats. And on stage, they wrestled with the biggest questions of their time: What is the nature of justice? What is the relationship between the individual and the state? What do we do when our human laws conflict with the laws of the gods? And most importantly, are we in control of our own lives, or are we just puppets of fate?

Fate, Family, and Fatal Flaws: The World of Sophocles

The greatest master of this art form was the playwright Sophocles. And his masterpiece, Oedipus Rex, is arguably the most perfect and devastating tragedy ever written.Most people know the basic story: Oedipus is a man fated to kill his father and marry his mother. But the genius of Sophocles’ play is that it’s not about that story happening. It’s about Oedipus discovering that it has already happened. The play is structured as a brilliant, horrifying detective story in which the lead detective gradually realizes that he himself is the murderer, and that the crime is far worse than he could ever have imagined.

The play opens in the city of Thebes, which is suffering from a terrible plague. The oracle at Delphi has declared that the plague will only end when the murderer of the previous king, Laius, is found and exiled. Oedipus, the current king, a man famous for his intelligence (he solved the riddle of the Sphinx, after all), promises to find the killer and save his city. He is a good king, a man of action.

What makes the play so tense is its masterful use of dramatic irony. We, the audience, know the myth. We know the horrible truth. But Oedipus is completely in the dark. So, every time he curses the killer, he is cursing himself. Every time he vows to bring the truth to light, we know that light will destroy him. He summons the blind prophet Tiresias, who tries to warn him to stop digging. But Oedipus, in his pride—his hubris—accuses the prophet of being part of a conspiracy. He is so confident in his own intellect that he can’t see the truth right in front of him. One by one, messengers and shepherds arrive, each bringing a piece of the puzzle that Oedipus thinks will exonerate him, but each piece only tightens the noose. The final revelation—that he was the baby abandoned on a mountainside, that the man he killed in a roadside argument years ago was his father, Laius, and that the woman he married, his beloved Jocasta, is his own mother—is absolutely crushing. Jocasta hangs herself, and Oedipus, unable to bear the sight of the world that has deceived him, takes the pins from her dress and gouges out his own eyes, screaming that they will never again see the wretched things he has done.It’s a brutal story. It asks a terrifying question: if a man as smart and as good as Oedipus can be so utterly destroyed by fate, what chance do any of us have? Is free will just an illusion? Oedipus Rex is the ultimate expression of the tragic worldview: that human greatness is fragile, that our greatest strengths can be our greatest weaknesses, and that there are forces in the universe far beyond our understanding or control.

The Gadfly and the Cave

Even as tragedy was exploring the limits of human knowledge on the stage, a new literary form was being forged in the marketplaces of Athens, designed to push those limits with relentless logic. This was the philosophical dialogue, and its master was Plato.

Plato was a student of Socrates, a famously ugly and eccentric man who wandered Athens asking people annoying questions. Socrates was the city’s self-described “gadfly,” stinging the lazy horse of the state into thinking about things it took for granted. What is justice? What is virtue? What is piety? He claimed to know nothing himself, but his method of cross-examination—the Socratic method—was brilliant at exposing the ignorance of those who claimed to be wise. This so infuriated the powerful that they eventually had him put to death on charges of impiety and corrupting the youth.

Plato, devastated by his master’s execution, dedicated his life to preserving and expanding upon his ideas. He did this by writing dozens of dialogues, starring Socrates as the main character. These weren’t dry philosophical treatises. They were miniature dramas, works of literature in their own right, where ideas clashed like characters in a play.

The most famous of these is the Allegory of the Cave, from his great work, The Republic. It’s a story designed to explain his theory of reality. Imagine, Socrates says, a group of prisoners who have been chained up in a cave their entire lives, facing a blank wall. Behind them is a fire, and people walk back and forth in front of the fire carrying puppets. The prisoners can only see the shadows of these puppets projected on the wall. For them, these shadows are reality.

Now, what if one prisoner is freed? He is forced to turn around and see the fire and the puppets. The light hurts his eyes, and he is confused. The objects seem less real to him than the shadows he is used to. Then, he is dragged out of the cave into the blinding sunlight. This is the world of true reality, the world of pure concepts or “Forms,” as Plato called them. After his eyes adjust, he sees the true nature of things. If he then returns to the cave to tell the other prisoners what he has seen, they won’t believe him. They will think he is crazy, and if he tries to free them, they might even kill him.

This powerful story is literature being used to explain a complex philosophical idea. The prisoners are us, living in a world of sensory illusion. The freed prisoner is the philosopher, and the journey out of the cave is the painful process of education. The story also reflects the fate of Socrates himself, the man who tried to show the Athenians the light and was killed for it. Through these dialogues, Plato didn’t just lay the groundwork for Western philosophy; he created a new way for literature to explore the world of ideas.

Greece’s Biggest Fan Club

As the power of Athens waned, a new, pragmatic, and militaristic power was rising to the west: Rome. The Romans were masters of engineering, law, and conquest. In matters of art and literature, however, they were unabashed superfans of the Greeks. The Roman poet Horace famously wrote, “Captive Greece took captive her savage conqueror.” Wealthy Romans educated their sons with Greek tutors, they copied Greek statues, and their writers adapted Greek literary forms to a Roman context.There was a distinct shift in emphasis. Where Greek literature often focused on individual brilliance, philosophical inquiry, and the struggle against fate, Roman literature was typically more practical, more patriotic, and more concerned with duty, order, and the glory of the state. If the quintessential Greek hero was Achilles, a force of individual passion, the quintessential Roman hero would be a man who sacrificed his personal happiness for a greater cause.

A Founding Myth for an Empire: Virgil’s Aeneid

The greatest expression of this Roman spirit is the epic poem The Aeneid, written by the poet Virgil during the reign of the first Roman Emperor, Augustus. Augustus had just brought an end to a century of bloody civil wars. He needed a great national story, a founding myth that would legitimize his rule and unite the Roman people with a sense of shared destiny. He commissioned Virgil to write it. The result is one of the most influential and beautiful works of propaganda ever created.

Virgil cleverly connected his story to the Trojan War, giving the Romans a heroic lineage that rivaled the Greeks. His hero is Aeneas, a Trojan prince who escapes the burning city of Troy, carrying his elderly father on his shoulders and leading his young son by the hand. He is a man defined not by rage or cunning, but by pietas—a uniquely Roman virtue that means a sense of duty to one’s family, one’s gods, and one’s destiny.

Aeneas is a very different kind of hero from Odysseus. Odysseus is trying to get home; Aeneas is trying to find a new home, the one he is fated to found in Italy. And frankly, he often doesn’t want to. He is weary, sad, and haunted by the loss of his wife and his city. He’s a reluctant hero, constantly having to subordinate his own desires to the commands of the gods.

His greatest test comes when he and his fellow Trojan refugees are shipwrecked in Carthage, a rising city in North Africa ruled by the magnificent Queen Dido. Dido and Aeneas fall deeply in love. For a time, Aeneas forgets his mission. He is happy. He has found a new home and a new love. But the gods send a messenger to remind him of his destiny: “You are not to build a city for yourself! You have a duty to your son, and to the generations of Romans who will follow!”

Aeneas is heartbroken. He knows he has to leave, but he doesn’t know how to tell Dido. When she finds out he is preparing his ships in secret, she confronts him in a scene of searing rage and despair that is one of the high points of all literature. Aeneas, weeping, can only reply, “I do not go of my own will.” As his ships sail away, Dido climbs onto a funeral pyre, curses Aeneas and his descendants—thus providing a mythical origin for the Punic Wars between Rome and Carthage—and kills herself with his sword. It is an absolutely devastating tragedy, a showcase of the immense personal cost of duty.

Aeneas eventually makes it to Italy, journeys to the underworld, and sees a grand parade of the souls of future Roman heroes: Caesar, Pompey, and culminating, of course, in his patron, Augustus. He then has to fight a brutal war to secure his claim to the land. The Aeneid is a complex work. It celebrates the glory of Rome, but it is also saturated with a deep sense of melancholy and loss—the lacrimae rerum, the “tears of things.” It’s a story that acknowledges that every great empire is built on a foundation of sacrifice and sorrow.

From the rage of Achilles to the tragic self-discovery of Oedipus, from the cunning of Odysseus to the dutiful suffering of Aeneas, the Greeks and Romans laid the foundations of the Western literary tradition. They gave us our archetypes of the hero and our models for drama. They showed us how literature could be used to question our place in the universe, to debate political ideas, and to forge a national identity. The house of Western literature is built on their blueprints, and we are still living in it today. But this is just one corner of the world. Our journey is a global one. Next time, we travel to a different continent, to a land of ancient spirituality and dizzying complexity. We will dive into a literary tradition where the epics are not just stories, but sacred texts that shape the lives of over a billion people. We’ll explore tales of divine princes, monkey gods, and a cataclysmic family war that is five times the length of The Iliad and The Odyssey combined. We’re heading to the Indian subcontinent to swim in “The Ocean of Stories.”

List of Episodes in the Series

The Story of Literature EP1 | The First Scribes: Tales from the Fertile Crescent

The Story of Literature EP2 | Echoes of Olympus: The Greek and Roman Foundations

The Story of Literature EP3 | The Ocean of Stories: Epics and Wisdom of South Asia

The Story of Literature EP4 | The Brush and the Sword: Poetry and Philosophy in East Asia

The Story of Literature EP5 | The Courtyard of a Thousand Tales: The Golden Age of Arabic and Persian Literature

The Story of Literature EP6 | Forging a Continent: From Beowulf to the Enlightenment

The Story of Literature EP7 | The Soul of the Steppe: The Great Russian Psychological Novel

The Story of Literature EP8 | Magic and Memory: The Boom of Latin American Literature

The Story of Literature EP9 | The Griot’s Legacy: Oral Traditions and Post-Colonial Voices of Africa

The Story of Literature EP10 | The Global Bookshelf: Migration, Identity, and the 21st-Century Story

Unlock A World of Learning by Becoming a Patron
Become a patron at Patreon!

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

<a href="https://englishpluspodcast.com/author/dannyballanowner/" target="_self">English Plus</a>

English Plus

Author

English Plus Podcast is dedicated to bring you the most interesting, engaging and informative daily dose of English and knowledge. So, if you want to take your English and knowledge to the next level, you're in the right place.

You may also Like

The Story of Literature EP10 | The Global Bookshelf: Migration, Identity, and the 21st-Century Story

The Story of Literature EP10 | The Global Bookshelf: Migration, Identity, and the 21st-Century Story

In our final episode, we look at the state of literature in our interconnected world. We explore how themes of migration, diaspora, and hybrid identities have come to the forefront. Featuring authors from Oceania, the Caribbean, and the global diaspora, we discuss how technology and globalization are shaping the future of storytelling and creating a truly “world” literature.

read more
The Story of Literature EP9 | The Griot’s Legacy: Oral Traditions and Post-Colonial Voices of Africa

The Story of Literature EP9 | The Griot’s Legacy: Oral Traditions and Post-Colonial Voices of Africa

This episode celebrates the immense diversity of African literature, from the ancient oral storytelling traditions of the Griots to the powerful emergence of post-colonial writing. We’ll discuss how authors like Chinua Achebe, Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o, and Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie have used literature to reclaim their history, grapple with the legacy of colonialism, and forge new identities.

read more

Recent Posts

The Story of Literature EP10 | The Global Bookshelf: Migration, Identity, and the 21st-Century Story

The Story of Literature EP10 | The Global Bookshelf: Migration, Identity, and the 21st-Century Story

In our final episode, we look at the state of literature in our interconnected world. We explore how themes of migration, diaspora, and hybrid identities have come to the forefront. Featuring authors from Oceania, the Caribbean, and the global diaspora, we discuss how technology and globalization are shaping the future of storytelling and creating a truly “world” literature.

read more
The Story of Literature EP9 | The Griot’s Legacy: Oral Traditions and Post-Colonial Voices of Africa

The Story of Literature EP9 | The Griot’s Legacy: Oral Traditions and Post-Colonial Voices of Africa

This episode celebrates the immense diversity of African literature, from the ancient oral storytelling traditions of the Griots to the powerful emergence of post-colonial writing. We’ll discuss how authors like Chinua Achebe, Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o, and Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie have used literature to reclaim their history, grapple with the legacy of colonialism, and forge new identities.

read more
The Story of Literature EP8 | Magic and Memory: The Boom of Latin American Literature

The Story of Literature EP8 | Magic and Memory: The Boom of Latin American Literature

We explore the vibrant and revolutionary literature of Latin America in the 20th century. This episode discusses how a generation of writers like Borges, García Márquez, and Allende blended indigenous mythology, political turmoil, and surrealism to create “Magical Realism”—a unique literary style that captured the complex reality of a continent.

read more

Categories

Follow Us

Pin It on Pinterest