The Invisible Force in Negotiations: How Anchoring Shapes Every Deal You Make

Introduction and Reading Strategies

Welcome to our reading comprehension practice series! The passages in international exams like the SAT, TOEFL, and IELTS test your ability to read effectively and efficiently under pressure. This exercise will help you build those skills.

Before you start, here are some key strategies:

• Skim for the Gist: Before reading carefully, quickly skim the passage (about 30-45 seconds). Read the first and last sentences of each paragraph to get a general sense of the topic and structure.
• Identify the Author’s Purpose: As you read, ask yourself: Is the author trying to inform, persuade, or explain? Understanding the purpose helps you interpret the tone and focus on the most important information.
• Vocabulary in Context: You will encounter unfamiliar words. Don’t panic! The surrounding sentences often provide clues to the word’s meaning. This skill is frequently tested.

Recommended Time: You should aim to read the passage and answer all 10 questions in 15-18 minutes. This will help you practice the time management needed for exam day.

Reading Passage

In the complex dance of human negotiation, we often believe we are rational actors, weighing pros and cons with objective precision. However, a powerful and often invisible cognitive force is constantly at play, subtly steering our decisions: the anchoring bias. First theorized by psychologists Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, this bias describes our tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of information offered (the “anchor”) when making decisions. Once an anchor is set, subsequent judgments are made by adjusting away from that initial value, but these adjustments are often insufficient. The initial number, whether relevant or not, perniciously tethers our thinking.

Perhaps the most classic illustration of anchoring occurs in retail and sales. Consider the process of buying a used car. A dealer might initially present a vehicle with a high sticker price. This price becomes the anchor. Even if the buyer knows the price is inflated and successfully negotiates it down significantly, their perception of what constitutes a “good deal” is now mentally tied to that initial high number. A final price that is thousands of dollars below the sticker price feels like a major victory, even if that final price is still above the car’s actual market value. The negotiation is not a search for an objective value; it becomes a game of moving away from a strategically placed starting point.

This phenomenon extends far beyond simple haggling. In salary negotiations, for instance, the first person to state a number often gains a distinct advantage. If a company’s initial offer for a position is $50,000, the candidate’s subsequent counteroffers are likely to hover around that figure. Had the candidate been the first to speak and requested $70,000, the entire negotiation would have been anchored to a much higher range, likely resulting in a more favorable outcome for the employee. The initial anchor establishes a playing field, and it can be difficult to move the game to a different park.

The application of anchoring is not always so overt. It can be employed with remarkable subtlety in contexts like restaurant menu design. A restaurateur might place a prohibitively expensive item, like a $150 “deluxe seafood platter,” at the top of the menu. The intention is not necessarily to sell many of these platters. Rather, the $150 price tag serves as an anchor that makes the other dishes, such as a $45 steak or a $35 pasta, seem reasonably priced in comparison. Diners, influenced by this high anchor, may be more inclined to select a more expensive entrée than they would have if the seafood platter were absent. The most expensive item isn’t there to be sold; it’s there to make everything else look like a bargain.

Recognizing the pervasive influence of the anchoring bias is the first step toward mitigating its effects. Savvy negotiators learn to either dismiss initial anchors as irrelevant or, more powerfully, to be the first to set their own. By understanding that the first number on the table is not a reflection of objective truth but a strategic starting point, one can begin to navigate the currents of negotiation with greater awareness and control, avoiding the invisible pull that can otherwise lead to a disadvantageous deal.

Reading Quiz

Keywords & Phrases

1. Cognitive force: A mental process or influence that affects thinking and behavior. The passage describes anchoring as a powerful “cognitive force” that shapes our decisions.
2. Perniciously: In a way that has a harmful effect, especially in a gradual or subtle manner. Used in the text to describe how an anchor harmfully “tethers our thinking.”
3. Tethers: To tie or bind something, limiting its movement. The passage uses this metaphorically to say that an anchor “tethers our thinking,” meaning it restricts our thoughts to a narrow range.
4. Inflated: Exaggerated; made to seem larger or more important than it really is. The car dealer’s initial sticker price is described as “inflated.”
5. Haggling: To dispute or bargain persistently, especially over the cost of something. The passage notes that anchoring extends beyond simple “haggling.”
6. Overt: Done or shown openly; not secret or hidden. The text explains that anchoring can be used in “overt” ways (like a sticker price) or subtle ways (like menu design).
7. Prohibitively expensive: So expensive that it prevents people from buying it. The deluxe seafood platter is “prohibitively expensive,” meaning most people won’t buy it.
8. Inclined: To have a tendency or be willing to do something. The passage suggests diners are more “inclined” to choose an expensive entrée when a higher anchor is present.
9. Pervasive: Spreading widely throughout an area or a group of people. The author recommends recognizing the “pervasive influence” of anchoring, meaning it’s everywhere.
10. Mitigating: Making something bad less severe, serious, or painful. The final paragraph suggests that awareness is the first step toward “mitigating” the negative effects of the anchoring bias.

Unlock A World of Learning by Becoming a Patron