SparkCast Episode
The SparkCast episode is not just a reading of the article below; it’s a lively discussion based on the topic of the article, so you don’t want to miss it!
Have You Ever Watched a Train Wreck Unfold?
A celebrity tweets something outrageous. A reality star flips a table. A musician starts a feud. You can’t look away, can you? We watch, we talk, we share, and their name is on everyone’s lips. It’s easy to look at this and think, “Wow, they’re getting so much attention, this must be great for their career!” This feeds into one of the oldest, most cynical adages in the book: all publicity is good publicity. But is it really? Or is that just a convenient myth for people who enjoy stirring the pot? It’s time to nurture that critical thinker inside you and take a closer look.
The Attention Machine: Why the Myth Exists
The logic behind the phrase, often misattributed to circus showman P.T. Barnum, is simple: the greatest crime is to be forgotten. In a crowded marketplace, whether you’re selling circus acts or a personal brand, attention is currency. A bad review is better than no review. A scandal gets your name in the headlines, makes you a topic of conversation, and for a certain type of celebrity (think reality stars, internet personalities), that attention can translate directly into followers, clicks, and dollars. It keeps them relevant. For them, being hated is better than being ignored. Their entire business model runs on the fuel of public chatter, good or bad.
When the Machine Backfires: The Career Killers
But here’s where we need to think more deeply. Ask yourself this: where are some of the celebrities who were involved in major scandals a few years ago? While some bounce back, many don’t. The myth that all publicity is good publicity dangerously ignores one crucial factor: the severity of the offense. There’s a universe of difference between a manufactured reality TV fight and a credible accusation of criminal behavior. In the age of “cancel culture,” which is really just a new name for public accountability, a major moral or ethical transgression can be a career-ending event. Endorsement deals are dropped, movie roles are recast, and public sentiment shifts from “love to hate” to “don’t want to see” them at all. The publicity isn’t good; it’s radioactive.
It’s Not Just What, It’s Who
The type of celebrity also matters immensely. Can an anti-establishment rock star or a controversial comedian survive—and even thrive—on negative press? Absolutely. It can burnish their brand, making them seem more authentic and rebellious to their target audience. But what about a beloved children’s television host or an actor known for playing wholesome, family-friendly roles? For them, the same scandal could be devastating. Their brand is built on trust, likability, and a certain image. Bad publicity doesn’t just get them talked about; it shatters the very foundation of their career.
The Verdict: A Lazy and Dangerous Myth
So, is all publicity good publicity? The verdict is a resounding no. It’s a lazy, overly simplistic take that fails to account for context, severity, and brand identity. While negative attention can certainly be leveraged for short-term gain by some, it can be an inescapable career poison for others. Believing the myth prevents us from thinking critically about what we’re seeing. It makes us passive consumers of controversy rather than active citizens who decide what kind of behavior we want to reward with our attention. The real power isn’t in the hands of the celebrity creating the drama; it’s in our hands, in what we choose to watch, share, and ultimately, support.
Can you think of a celebrity who was helped by bad publicity and one who was hurt by it? What was the difference? Share your examples and thoughts in the comments below!
Deep Discussion Questions:
- Where do you personally draw the line between an “interesting” scandal and a “career-ending” one? Has that line shifted for you over the years?
- Do you think social media has made the “all publicity is good publicity” myth more true or less true? Why?
- Beyond celebrities, how does this myth apply to brands or politicians? Can you think of examples where a company or political figure tried to use controversy to their advantage? Did it work?
Speaking Challenge:
You are a public relations crisis manager. Your celebrity client has just been involved in a minor, embarrassing (but not criminal) scandal. In 60 seconds, give them advice. Should they lean into it, ignore it, or apologize? Justify your strategy.
Hint for English Learners: This is great practice for giving advice and using conditional language. Use phrases like, “If I were you, I would…”, “The best course of action is to…”, “You should consider…”, and “The reason for this is…”.
0 Comments