The Role of Virtue Ethics in Modern Society | Listening Comprehension

Contents

[show]

Sharpen Your Listening Skills: Virtue Ethics

Welcome to our listening comprehension practice series, designed to help you excel in the listening sections of international exams like the TOEFL, IELTS, and SAT. Acing these tests isn’t just about understanding words; it’s about understanding ideas, context, and speaker intent.

Before you begin, here are a few powerful tips to guide your practice:

Predict and Prepare: Read the topic beforehand. What do you already know about virtue ethics? Thinking about the topic primes your brain to catch relevant vocabulary and concepts.
Listen for the Structure: Pay attention to signposting language (e.g., “First, I’ll discuss…”, “In contrast…”, “To summarize…”). These phrases are like a roadmap, helping you follow the speaker’s argument.
Focus on the Main Idea: Don’t get lost trying to understand every single word. If you miss a word, keep listening! Your main goal is to understand the overall message and the key supporting points.
Take Smart Notes: You can’t write down everything. Use abbreviations and symbols to note the most important points, like key theories, names, and relationships between ideas.

Now, let’s begin. You are about to hear a university lecture on the role of virtue ethics in modern society.

Listen

The Role of Virtue Ethics in Modern Society

Transcript

Listening Transcript: Please do not read the transcript before you listen and take the listening comprehension quiz.

Good morning, everyone. In our previous lectures, we’ve explored two of the major pillars of Western ethical thought: deontology, with its focus on duties and rules, and utilitarianism, which judges actions based on their consequences. Today, we turn our attention to the third major approach, one that has seen a significant resurgence in contemporary philosophy: virtue ethics.

Unlike the other two theories which ask, “What is the right thing to do?”, virtue ethics asks a fundamentally different question: “What kind of person should I be?” This shift in focus is crucial. It moves the lens away from isolated actions and towards the long-term character of the moral agent. The primary concern of virtue ethics is not the adherence to a set of rules or the calculation of outcomes, but the cultivation of a virtuous character.

The origins of this philosophy stretch back to ancient Greece, most notably to Aristotle and his seminal work, the “Nicomachean Ethics.” For Aristotle, the ultimate goal of human life is what he called eudaimonia. This Greek term is often translated as “happiness,” but that translation can be misleading. It’s not about a fleeting feeling of joy. A more accurate translation would be “human flourishing” or “living well and doing well.” It’s a state of being where a person achieves their fullest potential, and according to Aristotle, this is only possible by living a life of virtue.

So, what is a virtue? In the Aristotelian sense, a virtue is a mean, or a midpoint, between two extremes of vice. For example, the virtue of courage is the mean between the vices of cowardice (a deficiency of courage) and rashness (an excess of it). Similarly, generosity is the mean between stinginess and extravagance. These virtues are not innate; they are not something we are born with. Rather, they are character traits that must be developed and practiced over time, much like a musician practices an instrument. You become a courageous person by consistently performing courageous acts. You become generous by habitually practicing generosity. This process involves education, reflection, and, most importantly, habitual action.

This brings us to the core of its modern relevance. In a world that often feels overwhelmingly complex, where rigid rules can seem inadequate and calculating consequences can be impossible, virtue ethics offers a more flexible, person-centered approach. Think about the professional world. A doctor who operates purely on a deontological framework might follow every rule meticulously, but may lack the compassion—a key virtue—to treat patients with genuine care. A business leader focused solely on a utilitarian goal of maximizing profit might justify actions that are ethically questionable, whereas a leader guided by virtues like integrity, honesty, and justice would likely foster a healthier, more sustainable corporate culture.

The rise of artificial intelligence presents another fascinating arena for virtue ethics. Programmers and engineers are grappling with how to build ethical AI. While programming a machine to follow rules (deontology) or calculate the best outcome (utilitarianism) is feasible, how do you program wisdom, justice, or compassion? The discussion is shifting towards creating systems that support human virtues rather than replacing human judgment. The goal isn’t to create a “virtuous” AI, which might be a contradiction in terms, but to design AI that helps us, as humans, be more virtuous.

However, virtue ethics is not without its critics. One of the most significant challenges is the problem of cultural relativism. Are the virtues identified by Aristotle universal? Does a nomadic warrior culture value the same character traits as a modern, urban society? While proponents argue that certain core virtues—like wisdom, justice, and courage—are indeed cross-cultural, the specific expressions of these virtues can vary dramatically.

Another criticism is that virtue ethics doesn’t provide clear guidance in specific moral dilemmas. If you are faced with a difficult choice, being told to “act virtuously” might not be very helpful. Deontology gives you a rule to follow; utilitarianism gives you a metric to calculate. Virtue ethics offers a more nuanced, but less direct, form of guidance. The response from virtue ethicists is that this is a strength, not a weakness. Life is messy, and a mature moral agent develops what Aristotle called phronesis, or practical wisdom. This is the ability to perceive the specifics of a situation and understand which course of action is appropriate, not by applying a rigid formula, but through a well-developed, virtuous character.

In conclusion, the resurgence of virtue ethics signals a growing recognition that a good society is built not just on good laws and policies, but on good people. It places the responsibility for moral development squarely on the individual, emphasizing the lifelong journey of cultivating character. While it may not provide easy answers, it encourages us to aspire to be better people, to strive for that state of eudaimonia—a flourishing life. It challenges us to look inward and ask not just “What should I do right now?” but “Who do I want to become?”

Listening Comprehension Quiz

Key Vocabulary and Phrases

Virtue Ethics:
- What it means: An approach to ethics that focuses on a person’s character as the primary source of moral action, rather than rules or consequences.
- How it was used: The entire lecture is about this topic, contrasting it with other theories by explaining it asks “What kind of person should I be?”
Eudaimonia:
- What it means: A Greek term that means “human flourishing” or “living well.” It’s a deeper concept than just “happiness.”
- How it was used: The lecturer explained this is the ultimate goal of human life according to Aristotle, achievable only by living a life of virtue.
Deontology:
- What it means: An ethical theory that states that actions are good or bad based on a clear set of rules. It’s focused on duty and obligation.
- How it was used: The lecture introduced deontology as one of the major ethical theories it was comparing virtue ethics against.
Utilitarianism:
- What it means: An ethical theory that holds that the best action is the one that maximizes utility, usually defined as that which maximizes well-being for the greatest number of people.
- How it was used: This was the second theory the lecturer used as a point of comparison, noting its focus on consequences.
Seminal Work:
- What it means: A foundational and highly influential piece of writing or art.
- How it was used: The lecturer referred to Aristotle’s “Nicomachean Ethics” as his “seminal work,” indicating its importance to philosophy.
Cultivating Character:
- What it means: The process of actively developing and nurturing positive moral and personal qualities over time.
- How it was used: This phrase was used to describe the central activity in virtue ethics—the lifelong journey of becoming a good person.
Innate:
- What it means: A quality or ability that you are born with, rather than one you have learned.
- How it was used: The lecturer stated that virtues are not innate, emphasizing that they must be learned and practiced.
Cultural Relativism:
- What it means: The idea that a person’s beliefs and practices should be understood based on that person’s own culture, rather than be judged against the criteria of another.
- How it was used: This was presented as a major criticism of virtue ethics, questioning whether the same virtues are valued across all cultures.
Phronesis(Practical Wisdom):
- What it means: An ancient Greek concept for a type of wisdom or intelligence relevant to practical action. It implies good judgment.
- How it was used: The lecturer explained that virtue ethicists believe a person with phronesis can make good moral judgments without needing a strict set of rules.
Resurgence:
- What it means: A renewal of activity or interest in something after a period of decline.
- How it was used: The lecture began by noting the “significant resurgence” of virtue ethics in contemporary philosophy, meaning it has become popular and important again.