Do you ever think about how unlikely it is that you and the people you love are alive at the same time?
I mean it seriously. Consider the arithmetic. Human beings have been here for something like three hundred thousand years. Your particular window is perhaps eighty of them, if you're fortunate. And every person you have ever met, everyone you've loved, argued with, worked beside, or missed — every one of them happened to be issued a window that overlaps yours.
There's a word for that, and we've almost entirely wasted it on furniture.
Contemporary. It's Latin: con-, with or together, and tempus, time. Of the same time. Sharing an era. The same tempus that gives us temporal, temporary, tempo — all of them about time's passing and measure.
But look how we use it. We mostly use it to mean modern. Contemporary art. Contemporary design. Contemporary furniture, which usually means a low sofa with thin legs. We've taken a word about the profound coincidence of shared existence and made it a decorating category.
And there's an interesting slippage in that, worth noticing. When we say contemporary art, we mean art of our time. But that's a peculiar assumption — the word simply means of the same time as something. Every era's art was contemporary art to the people in it. Cave paintings were contemporary. A Roman mosaic was somebody's new thing. The word is entirely relative and we use it as though it named a fixed style, which tells you something about how naturally we place ourselves at the center of time.
But I want to reclaim the older, deeper use, which is the one applied to people.
Historians talk about contemporaries — people who lived at the same time as each other. And the moment you start thinking that way, the fact becomes genuinely strange. Because contemporary is a relationship, and it's one of the most powerful ones there is, and it operates entirely below our notice.
Here's what I mean. Think of anyone who mattered to you enormously. A grandparent. A teacher. A friend who arrived at exactly the right moment. And now consider that for you to have met them at all, an extraordinary set of coincidences had to hold. Your window and theirs had to overlap, and not merely overlap — they had to overlap while both of you were the right ages for the relationship you had. Move either birth by twenty years and the whole thing evaporates. Your grandparent becomes a name on a document. Your teacher becomes someone who taught a previous generation. Your closest friend becomes a stranger who was in their fifties when you were born.
Everyone you love is a scheduling coincidence. That's not cynical — I find it staggering. Out of all the people who have ever existed, you got to be simultaneous with a specific few thousand, and out of those, a specific few dozen mattered.
And there's a shadow to that thought, which is the people you missed. There are human beings who would have understood you better than anyone you've ever met, and they died in 1780, or they'll be born in 2140. The overlap is the only thing that separates a stranger from the great friendship of your life.
Which is why I think reading is such an odd miracle. It's the one technology we have for being contemporary with the dead. Someone wrote a sentence four hundred years ago and it arrives in your mind now, in your voice, doing exactly what it was designed to do. The overlap fails, and language routes around the failure. That's not a small thing. It's the only known workaround for the tyranny of tempus.
But here's the part I actually want to leave you with, and it's about the living.
We treat our contemporaries as the default background of existence. The people currently alive are simply there — they're the cast, the ambient population, the given. And so we're careless with them in a way we would never be if we noticed the arithmetic.
Because the overlap has an end. Every contemporary relationship is bounded on both sides — it began when the later of you arrived, and it ends when the earlier of you leaves. You are, right now, inside the finite overlap you share with every single person you love. There is a specific number of years remaining in which you and your mother are contemporaries. There's a number for you and your oldest friend. Nobody knows the numbers, and everybody behaves as though they were large.
That's not meant to be morbid. It's meant to point at something the word already knows: contemporary is a temporary condition. It has tempus in it, and tempus moves.
And there's one more turn, which is forward-facing. You are also somebody's contemporary in the other direction. There are people alive now — small ones, mostly — whose windows overlap yours at the end rather than the beginning, and to whom you'll be the older figure whose presence was a coincidence they'll marvel at later. That's happening right now, and you probably haven't noticed which ones.
So the word turns out not to be about style at all. It's about the improbable, brief, unrepeatable fact of being here at the same time as the specific people who are here at the same time as you.
So here's what I'll leave you with. Every person you love is someone whose window happened to overlap yours, by an accident of a few decades in a species three hundred thousand years old. So think about who you'd be genuinely lost without. And then ask yourself the question the word is quietly asking: given that you're only contemporaries for a while — what exactly are you doing with the overlap?
0 Comments